Home
  • About
    • Philosophy and our goals
    • Governance
    • Organisational structure
    • Patrons
    • Our Impact
    • Tasmania
    • Jobs
    • Search
    • Annual reports
  • Research
    • Research Papers
    • Sort by Author
    • Submissions
    • National Energy Emissions Audit
    • Community Resources
    • Climate & Energy Program
    • Accountability Project
  • In the News
    • Media Releases
    • Infographics
    • Opinion
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Our blog
    • Petitions
  • Contact
  • Events
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
    • Make a one off donation
    • Make a regular donation

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: A cautionary tale from Australia

If a binding agreement can be reached on a post-2012 international climate regime, it is likely to include a market-based instrument for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and enhancing forest sinks in developing countries (collectively known as 'REDD-plus'). Under such a scheme, countries that reduce net REDD emissions below a pre-set baseline would receive credits that could be sold in carbon markets and used by purchasing nations to meet their international mitigation obligations. This paper draws on the Australian experience with deforestation to identify some of the issues that might obstruct progress on REDD. For the past 20 years, Australia has had the highest rate of deforestation in the developed world””370,000 ha of 'Kyoto forests' were cleared annually between 1990 and 2007, resulting in the emission of ~80 MtCO2-e/yr. It is also the only developed country that will rely on reduced deforestation emissions as the primary way of meeting its quantified emission reduction target under the Kyoto Protocol. Australia's approach to deforestation issues, both domestically and internationally, provides valuable insights into the difficulties a REDD-plus scheme might encounter in the future.

Type of Publication: 
Research
Section: 
Forestry

Download Publication: 
PDF icon PB 12 REDD Aust case study final_7.pdf

Author: 
Andrew Macintosh
Posted on:
6 May 2010

>> Share this Page

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

.

The Australia Institute is the country’s most influential progressive think tank. We conduct research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues in order to inform public debate and bring greater accountability to the democratic process.

Sitemap:

  • About
  • Philosophy and our goals
  • Research
  • Opinion Pieces
  • In the News
  • Media Releases
  • Make a one off donation
  • Make a regular donation
  • Contact
  • Governance
  • Join mailing list

Other Initiatives

  • Centre for Future Work
  • The Australia Institute Tasmania
  • No New Coal Mines
  • Go Home On Time Day
  • Climate & Energy Program
  • The Australia Institute acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as First Australians and recognise their culture, history, diversity and their deep connection to the land.

    The team at The Australia Institute acknowledges that the Australian Capital Territory is Ngunnawal Country and pay our respects to Elders past and present.

  • Copyright The Australia Institute |
  • RSS feed |
  • Website Privacy Policy