Targeting meaningful change
What is the point of Canberra’s 40 per cent emission reduction target? If you thought it was to help reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions then you should probably be far more concerned with the current negotiations between the Gillard Government, the Greens, Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Put simply, unless those negotiations result in a national scheme that recognises the ambitions of Canberrans then the 40per cent target will be nothing more than an expensive gesture on the part of the ACT. While the media focus is currently on the price of the interim “carbon tax” it is the Government’s clear intention to move as quickly as possible to its old emissions trading scheme. And once that begins, the interaction between the ACT’s targets and the national emissions cap becomes crucial.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Conflict of Interest Concerns Spread to Climate Authority after PwC Scandal
The Minister for Climate Change and Energy has been urged to review potential conflicts of interests at Australia’s key climate change agency in light of the integrity scandal at PwC and the consulting services sector.
Australia’s compromised climate negotiators
Sitting in a bar in Manhattan recently, there for Climate Week NYC and the United Nations Climate Ambition Summit, I watched as Australians from both government and the private sector worked the room.
Australia’s greenwash plan to host COP31
Labor announced its desire to host a United Nations climate conference in the lead-up to the 2022 election. Officially called the Conference of the Parties, the UN describes its COPs as “the biggest and most important annual climate-related conferences on the planet”. They bring together nation states to negotiate on how best to tackle climate