Home
  • About
    • Philosophy and our goals
    • Governance
    • Organisational structure
    • Patrons
    • Our Impact
    • Tasmania
    • Jobs
    • Search
    • Annual reports
  • Research
    • Research Papers
    • Sort by Author
    • Submissions
    • National Energy Emissions Audit
    • Community Resources
    • Climate & Energy Program
    • Accountability Project
  • In the News
    • Media Releases
    • Infographics
    • Opinion
    • Podcast
    • Videos
    • Our blog
    • Petitions
  • Contact
  • Events
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
    • Make a one off donation
    • Make a regular donation

Truth in Political Advertising

87.7% of respondents in a post-election poll say the Senate should pass ‘truth in political advertising’ legislation.

Only 5% of respondents in the survey of 2875 voters did not support legislation so that political parties and candidates could be fined for false and misleading advertising in the same way companies are.

“It would seem wise to hold an enquiry about how truth in political advertising could be implemented fairly, consistent with the constitution, in Australia,” Executive Director of The Australia Institute, Ben Oquist said.

“In the past there was an industry self-regulating system for truth in TV political advertising, but since then it has effectively been a free-for-all.

“Obviously political campaigning needs to be strong and robust, but it is time to have a fresh look at the system.”
Currently political parties are exempt from truth-in-advertising laws which apply to other products. 

“South Australia already has some limited provisions and Tasmania haves rules that prevent the use of an opponent’s name or image without their permission, but clearly there is an appetite for nation-wide laws.

“Scare campaigns have been blamed by incumbent governments who have lost support for at least the last four federal elections.

“It should be in the interest of all parties for rules that ensure that political expression is robust, fair and truthful.

“Time is ripe to see if it possible to have a national consistent scheme that is Constitutional, upholds free speech, but brings in a measure of fairness and accountability to the political process,” Oquist said.

Type of Publication: 
Media Releases
Section: 
Government and Accountability
Society

Download Publication: 
PDF icon TAI - National - 4 July 2016_results_truth_in_advertising.pdf

Author: 
The Australia Institute
Posted on:
10 July 2016

>> Share this Page

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

.

The Australia Institute is the country’s most influential progressive think tank. We conduct research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues in order to inform public debate and bring greater accountability to the democratic process.

Other Initiatives

  • Centre for Future Work
  • The Australia Institute Tasmania
  • No New Coal Mines
  • Go Home On Time Day
  • Centre for Responsible Technology
  • Climate & Energy Program
  • Nordic Policy Centre
  • The Australia Institute acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as First Australians and recognise their culture, history, diversity and their deep connection to the land.

    The team at The Australia Institute acknowledges that the Australian Capital Territory is Ngunnawal Country and pay our respects to Elders past and present.

  • Copyright The Australia Institute |
  • RSS feed |
  • Website Privacy Policy